Latest modern slavery fight updates -

Why Are Child Sex Trafficking Victims Being Arrested?

  • Published on
    March 12, 2019
  • News Source Image
  • Category:
    Child Slavery, Human Trafficking
Hero Banner

Last month a judge in Kansas made national headlines for erroneously claiming that two girls — just 13 and 14-years-old — were “aggressors” in a case where a 67-year-old man paid them to have sex.

“So, she’s uncomfortable for something that she voluntarily went to, voluntarily took her top off for, and was paid for?” said Kansas Judge Michael Gibbens.

“I wonder, what kind of trauma there really was to this victim under those peculiar circumstances?”

Take Action: Protect Runaway and Homeless Youth

The public responded with outrage, but the issue of children who are victims of sex trafficking being charged for prostitution and minor crimes they were forced to commit is nothing new.

Writing in a piece for Wichita State University, Dr. Karen Countryman-Roswurm from the Center for Combating Human Trafficking, Wichita State University and Linda Smith from Shared Hope International explain:

As a society, we must ask, why did money sanitize what, in any other circumstance, would be considered child rape? And more concerning, how did the exchange of money shift the narrative so dramatically so as to characterize children as aggressors in the crime of which they were victims?

The answers lie in the paradox in which victims of child sex trafficking are legally apprehended and consequently, socially stigmatized.  Twenty-five states, including Kansas, still allow commercially sexually exploited minors to be charged and prosecuted for prostitution and human trafficking offenses despite federal and state laws that recognize these same minors as victims of child sex trafficking.

This paradox still exists despite an increase in awareness, and specific laws to protect children from such offenses over the last couple of decades.

Criminalizing youth who have experienced the horrors of commercial sexual exploitation, and oftentimes survived traumatic experiences that predate the exploitation, is not only the gravest of injustices but also prevents survivors from receiving critical services and ongoing, specialized care.

Notably, the age of consent in Kansas is 16, meaning sexual contact between an adult and the minors in this case was not consensual. Still, comments on social media surrounding this case tried to place blame on these two girls, calling them “delinquent,” “out of control,” “promiscuous,” and “prostitutes.”

As Countryman-Roswurm and Smith write, “as Kansans we must ask ourselves: How do we really view individuals who have been victimized by and survived human trafficking? If we truly care, how do we shift our culture to recognize all survivors of sexual violence, including child sex trafficking, as unequivocally blameless in the conduct that constitutes their very victimization?”


Freedom United is interested in hearing from our community and welcomes relevant, informed comments, advice, and insights that advance the conversation around our campaigns and advocacy. We value inclusivity and respect within our community. To be approved, your comments should be civil.

stop icon A few things we do not tolerate: comments that promote discrimination, prejudice, racism, or xenophobia, as well as personal attacks or profanity. We screen submissions in order to create a space where the entire Freedom United community feels safe to express and exchange thoughtful opinions.

Notify of
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Richard Clark
Richard Clark
5 years ago

Sexual activity with a child below the age of consent is unlawful. The fact money changed hands is irrelevant. The 67 year old male should have been charged with the relevant crimes, incarcerated and placed on the sexual offenders register with all the attendant publicity.
The girls should have been offered all available assistance to recover from these crimes against them,

Sheila A Walsh
5 years ago

This is outrageous. i just show a show on TV the other night, and i couln’t believe authorities would send to prison an obvious victim of child trafficking. What is going on in this society?

5 years ago

probably can’t bear the financial and emotional cost of a lengthy court case. For some reason, the judges often don’t use their authority to stand up for the victims who desperately need and deserve their help. They deny that violence has actually taken place and even allow for the roles to be inversed, which means that the victims suddenly become the offenders and get punished. To me, this shows that violence against minors (and women, for that matter) is still tolerated and promoted

Ruth wells Wells
Ruth wells Wells
5 years ago

This judge is in on having sex with a child. This why he has these ideas. All people in all walks of life is involved with white slavery of the world. I wish all the population of the world would understand this problem better.

Sophie Meneguzzi
Sophie Meneguzzi
5 years ago

I am surprised that a man with such a sick headspace as the Judge, is allowed to have a say in a
Sexual assault case involving minors.

This week

Modern slavery victims at the heart of U.K.'s controversial Rwanda deportation policy

In a significant development in U.K. immigration policy, the debate over the Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill, recently renamed the Safety of Rwanda Bill, has intensified. Central to this controversy is the treatment of victims of modern slavery, with the legislative outcome heavily impacting their rights and safety. Legislative standoff After a prolonged standoff between the unelected House of Lords and the elected House of Commons, expectations

| Tuesday April 16, 2024

Read more