UK Served £1m Bill for Shortchanging Victims -

UK Served £1m Bill for Shortchanging Victims

  • Published on
    November 8, 2018
  • News Source Image
  • Category:
    Human Trafficking, Law & Policy, Rehabilitation & Liberation, Victories
Hero Banner

A high court judge has ruled the the UK Home Office unlawfully slashed aid for victims of trafficking.

The ruling has tremendous implications — the government must now make back-payments to victims, a sum that is likely to surpass 1,000,000 pounds.

Related Campaign: Support for all UK victims of modern slavery.

Back in March the Home Office announced that it would nearly halve support for victims of modern slavery, cutting their weekly support from £65 per week to £37.75, a fall of 42%. The government argued this was needed to bring down aid for trafficking victims to match that of destitute asylum seekers.

Under the National Referral Mechanism, a government program to identify victims of modern slavery, victims are entitled to support from the government while they wait for a decision on their case and begin their rehabilitation.

The Guardian reports:

In a judgment that condemned the Home Office as failing in its duty to victims of trafficking, Mr Justice Mostyn ruled that the government acted unlawfully in reducing the payments and ordered back-payments likely to exceed £1m.

He said: “The claimants and anyone else subjected to the cut are entitled to be repaid at the rate of £27.25 per week from the date that the cut was imposed on them until the date of repayment.”

He added that “the very substantial cut imposed unilaterally” by the department was taken on a false basis and could not stand.

He said the home secretary, Sajid Javid, had an “absolute duty immediately to issue the guidance that parliament has required of him” and that “any further delay would be completely unacceptable”.

One trafficking victim, K, welcomed the verdict.

“I am so happy with the judgment and how it will help other victims affected by the cuts, like me. I was so low because I was not able to do the activities which had been helping me before my money was cut.”

Silvia Nicolaou Garcia of Simpson Millar solicitors added that the cuts had caused her client to “accrue debt…[he] could no longer afford to buy food, clothes or mobile credit to allow him to keep in touch with his professional support network or his friends.”

The Home Office says it will accept the court ruling.

“We are committed to reforming the National Referral Mechanism to ensure victims of modern slavery get the support they need. We accept the court judgment and will set out our response in due course,” said a spokesperson.


Freedom United is interested in hearing from our community and welcomes relevant, informed comments, advice, and insights that advance the conversation around our campaigns and advocacy. We value inclusivity and respect within our community. To be approved, your comments should be civil.

stop icon A few things we do not tolerate: comments that promote discrimination, prejudice, racism, or xenophobia, as well as personal attacks or profanity. We screen submissions in order to create a space where the entire Freedom United community feels safe to express and exchange thoughtful opinions.

Notify of
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Andrew Sykes
Andrew Sykes
5 years ago

Why should we be paying for this, no money should be given to organisations like this, I amsick and tired of being ripped off all the time.

Maire Lawless
Maire Lawless
5 years ago

They are victims of modern slavery living in Britain exploited by British employers. “Setting out a response” is not an answer. Repaying them to money should be done immediately so that7 justice
is seen to be done straight away. Who could live on £37.75 a week.?One million pounds is a drop in the ocean for the government but is a life saver for these traumatised victims.

This week

Passing of CSDDD blocked – human rights in danger

What could have been a day to celebrate, has turned into a day full of disappointment. On February 28, 2024, the European Council blocked the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD) after the vote had been postponed due to insufficient support, as reported by Reuters. Thirteen out of the 27 member states voted against the law or abstained from the vote, leaving the ‘qualified majority' of 15 countries short of one. A timeline of

| Wednesday February 28, 2024

Read more