The Two-Fronted Fight of Sex Workers Against Trafficking -

The Two-Fronted Fight of Sex Workers Against Trafficking

  • Published on
    June 14, 2019
  • News Source Image
  • Category:
    Human Trafficking, Worker Empowerment
Hero Banner

Sex workers are in a difficult position, fighting both exploitation in the sex industry and misguided policies that are supposed to help them, according to a new op-ed by Boglárka Fedorkó in Open Democracy.

Fedorkó writes that sex worker organizations all acknowledge that exploitation and forced labor exist in the sex industry, but too often these groups are excluded from anti-trafficking events and programming.

As a result, policies and reports aimed at combating trafficking erroneously claim that prostitution is a form of slavery — a perspective that is pushed by the exclusion of sex workers from the discussion and crucial funding.

Fedorkó explains in Open Democracy:

Sex workers’ own analysis of the issues affecting them is not heard at policy-making levels because sex worker organisations are routinely discredited and dismissed.

They are given no access to formulate their views in these arenas. For example, not one sex worker organisation has been allowed into the European Union Civil Society Platform against Trafficking in Human Beings, which contains over 100 participants, despite many groups’ efforts to join.

These exclusionary mechanisms also manifest in funding. A review of 321 anti-trafficking projects financed by the European Commission between 2004 and 2015 shows that not a single project had a sex worker-led organisation as a project lead.

This is unfortunate but not surprising. Sex worker groups only rarely receive funding from their own national, provincial and municipal governments. Consequently they do not have sufficient capacity to reach as high as commission-level funding.

So what would sex worker organizations say if they were allowed access to anti-trafficking spaces?

As Fedorkó states, the most common challenges facing sex workers is the casual, insecure character of their labor arrangements. Furthermore, she says that the “end demand” model only exacerbates sex workers’ vulnerability to discrimination and violence, on top of decreasing their incomes.

“Shifting the mode of intervention away from blanket criminalisation and toward supporting sex workers to stay safe while they work gives us many more points of entry than abolition alone,” writes Fedorkó.

“Sex workers have an in-depth knowledge of the sex industry and are the only ones to have experienced life as a sex worker. They should be the driving force behind anti-trafficking policies, not the collateral damage of measures that aim to save them.”

Subscribe

Freedom United is interested in hearing from our community and welcomes relevant, informed comments, advice, and insights that advance the conversation around our campaigns and advocacy. We value inclusivity and respect within our community. To be approved, your comments should be civil.

stop icon A few things we do not tolerate: comments that promote discrimination, prejudice, racism, or xenophobia, as well as personal attacks or profanity. We screen submissions in order to create a space where the entire Freedom United community feels safe to express and exchange thoughtful opinions.

Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

This week

Passing of CSDDD blocked – human rights in danger

What could have been a day to celebrate, has turned into a day full of disappointment. On February 28, 2024, the European Council blocked the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD) after the vote had been postponed due to insufficient support, as reported by Reuters. Thirteen out of the 27 member states voted against the law or abstained from the vote, leaving the ‘qualified majority' of 15 countries short of one. A timeline of

| Wednesday February 28, 2024

Read more