Should Cambodian Surrogates Face Human Trafficking Charges? -

Should Cambodian Surrogates Face Human Trafficking Charges?

  • Published on
    May 17, 2019
  • News Source Image
  • Category:
    Human Trafficking, Law & Policy
Hero Banner

Women’s rights activists in Cambodia are calling for new laws on commercial surrogacy to not criminalize surrogate mothers under human trafficking legislation.

Their call follows the release of 11 surrogates from prison on Friday; allowed to go free after agreeing to raise their clients’ babies. However, they carry trafficking charges.

Cambodia has seen a surge in commercial surrogacy since neighboring Thailand banned the practice in 2015. Surrogates have been offered $10,000 — more than six times the average annual salary in Cambodia — to carry foreigners’ babies.

Thomson Reuters Foundation reports:

Dozens of surrogates have been charged under human trafficking laws and face up to 20 years in prison – a scenario that must change under the new law, said Chak Sopheap, head of the Cambodian Center for Human Rights (CCHR).

Family pressures, often brought about by excessive debt, can drive young women into surrogacy, women’s rights experts said.

The release on bail last month of 11 surrogate mothers – some of whom gave birth in detention – follows that of 32 in December who were carrying babies for Chinese clients.

“They agreed to not sell the babies, so we released them. But they remain under the supervision of the judge,” Chou Bun Eng, deputy head of the National Committee for Counter Trafficking. “The law will follow them. In cases (where) they sell, they will be sent back to prison.”

While it is unclear what the new surrogacy laws will cover, Bun Eng suggested that surrogates are still criminal accomplices, saying “They cooperate with the traffickers, so they are involved in the crime.”

Ros Sopheap, director of the charity Gender and Development for Cambodia, said that surrogacy should be outlawed for now in Cambodia as there is no guarantee of the safety of procedures.

Still, “As long as demand is there, secret networks will continue to operate,” she added.


Freedom United is interested in hearing from our community and welcomes relevant, informed comments, advice, and insights that advance the conversation around our campaigns and advocacy. We value inclusivity and respect within our community. To be approved, your comments should be civil.

stop icon A few things we do not tolerate: comments that promote discrimination, prejudice, racism, or xenophobia, as well as personal attacks or profanity. We screen submissions in order to create a space where the entire Freedom United community feels safe to express and exchange thoughtful opinions.

Notify of
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
4 years ago

I really fail to see the problem with commercial surrogacy. If a poor woman in a poor country agrees to do this we have two parties who are happy with the transaction. As usual do-gooders are trying to impose their opinions on everyone else regardless of what everyone else wants. This also appears to be a case of the white mans burden..

Professor Emeritus Ferrel Christensen
Professor Emeritus Ferrel Christensen
4 years ago

The title of this article is a question, one not answered in the article itself. How about this answer: ‘Hell, No!’

This week

Asylum seekers face ongoing inhumanity by U.K. government

The Rwanda Bill, discriminatory GPS tagging coupled with a raft of other inhumane legislation, all underline the U.K. government’s current uncompassionate and often brutal response to those seeking asylum at its shores. And despite ample evidence of the ruthless results these policies have led to, the government is expanding its scope and remains unapologetic. Meanwhile migrants, often fleeing violence and exploitation including modern slavery, pay the

| Wednesday May 15, 2024

Read more