U.K. Rwanda deportation flight stopped by legal action

U.K. Rwanda deportation flight stopped by legal action

  • Published on
    June 15, 2022
  • News Source Image
  • Category:
    Law & Policy
Hero Banner

The first flight sending people seeking asylum in the U.K. to Rwanda was stopped by a last-minute intervention from the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) on Tuesday. We welcome this development that has also been celebrated by migrants’ rights groups and supporters, but the Home Secretary Priti Patel insists the plan will go ahead.

The ECHR decision

The plane, which cost the taxpayer £500,000 (around $600,000), was abandoned just minutes before takeoff after some of the passengers won a legal reprieve. It appears that an out-of-hours ECHR judge granted appeals while the people were being taken from a detention center to the airport.

One injunction concerned an Iraqi man in his 50s. Medical records proved he had signs of possible torture when he arrived in the U.K. in May to claim asylum. Similar injunctions were made for other people set to travel on the chartered aircraft.

The ECHR decision came after the assessment of the UN High Commissioner for Refugees that people seeking asylum in Rwanda lack access to “fair and efficient procedures for the determination of refugee status.”

Despite this roadblock, Priti Patel has said she will not be deterred. The Independent quotes:

Many of those removed from this flight will be placed on the next. Our legal team are reviewing every decision made on this flight and preparation for the next flight begins now.

Is the policy actually deterring people?

Ministers justify the U.K. government plan to send people seeking asylum to Rwanda based on the claim that it would deter people from making dangerous journeys across the English Channel, and so disrupt the business model of smugglers.

However, the claim that this policy would act as a deterrent has been disproven. Last week, chief inspector of borders and immigration David Neal told the U.K. Parliament he had not seen any evidence of the policy reducing the number of people arriving via the English Channel.

The Refugee Council chief executive Enver Solomon is quoted in the Independent, saying:

We always knew these measures would do little to stop desperate people making dangerous journeys to the UK, because they do absolutely nothing to address the reasons people come.

Safe routes are the solution

Many organizations and individuals, including Freedom United, have also questioned the government’s claim that the policy will protect people from dangerous journeys and traffickers. They argue that the best strategy for protecting people on the move would be to instead establish safe migratory routes.

Clare Moseley, founder of Care4Calais, is quoted in the Independent, saying:

You have to question the motivation. It’s not because they want to stop people traffickers and save lives, because if they wanted to do that they would open up more safe routes for refugees.

The Freedom United community is calling governments out for misusing anti-trafficking rhetoric in a bid to justify policies which actually exacerbate people’s vulnerability to trafficking. We’re calling on the U.K. government, and governments around the world, to introduce asylum and migration policies which protect human rights. Join us today.

Subscribe

Freedom United is interested in hearing from our community and welcomes relevant, informed comments, advice, and insights that advance the conversation around our campaigns and advocacy. We value inclusivity and respect within our community. To be approved, your comments should be civil.

stop icon A few things we do not tolerate: comments that promote discrimination, prejudice, racism, or xenophobia, as well as personal attacks or profanity. We screen submissions in order to create a space where the entire Freedom United community feels safe to express and exchange thoughtful opinions.

Notify of
guest
4 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Monica Haynes
Monica Haynes
1 year ago

This idea of sending asylum seeking people to Ruanda is not only inhumane, it is also pure nonsense

T.Webber
1 year ago

Asylum seekers should stay in a large safe country like France. We do not have the resources or infrastructure to accommodate unlimited numbers of people

Monica Haynes
Monica Haynes
1 year ago

This idea of sending asylum seeking people to Ruanda is not only inhumane.It is also pure nonsense

Jeff Ludgate
Jeff Ludgate
1 year ago

The flow of illegal immigrants to the UK must be brought under control. There is no reason for illegal immigrants to leave the safe country of France. Once in a safe country a potential immigrant can apply legally to enter the UK and this is what they should do.

This week

Passing of CSDDD blocked – human rights in danger

What could have been a day to celebrate, has turned into a day full of disappointment. On February 28, 2024, the European Council blocked the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD) after the vote had been postponed due to insufficient support, as reported by Reuters. Thirteen out of the 27 member states voted against the law or abstained from the vote, leaving the ‘qualified majority' of 15 countries short of one. A timeline of

| Wednesday February 28, 2024

Read more