Safeguarding Those with Learning Disabilities from Forced Marriage -

Safeguarding Those with Learning Disabilities from Forced Marriage

  • Published on
    May 16, 2018
  • News Source Image
  • Category:
    Forced Marriage
Hero Banner

Forced marriage among people with learning disabilities, an issue not often talked about in conversations about forced marriage, is on the rise. According to the UK’s Forced Marriage Unit, the number of people with learning disabilities vulnerable or subjected to forced marriage increased every year from 2010-2016.

Social workers are now trying to address the problem as situations of forced marriage involving learning disabilities may present themselves differently from other cases. At the University of Nottingham, the “My Marriage My Choice” research project aims to explore this precise issue, developing guidance to safeguard children and adults with learning disabilities. As part of the study, researchers interviewed people with learning disabilities, their families, and community/faith leaders.

Some of the main challenges are that people with learning disabilities may not be able to fully consent to marriage, or they are more vulnerable to being tricked or coerced into marriage.

Community Care reports on the main findings from the “My Marriage My Choice” study:

Capacity to consent to marriage was frequently misunderstood with some people believing that as long as the person with a learning disability could say yes to the marriage this was enough for it to go ahead. The research found that some practitioners struggled to recognise forced marriage as such as the motivators can be very different to those for people without learning disabilities.

Most often, families are looking for a long-term carer for their relative and believe they are doing the ‘right’ thing, which can make it difficult for practitioners.

There are a number of warning signs that practitioners can look out for. These include: the person with a learning disability talking about marriage, buying wedding clothes or jewellery or traveling abroad for a wedding – they may present as excited or anxious about this; family members asking practitioners to sign a passport application or talking about a holiday abroad and; family members refusing care and support services.

While these warning signs are not absolute indicators of forced marriage, they may prompt social workers to have a conversation with the individual’s family to assess the situation.

Still, this is complex balancing act for social workers. “It is crucial that the rights of people to marry are not thwarted where they have capacity to consent, but it must also be acknowledged that, for some families, the news that their son or daughter cannot marry will create difficulties in terms of how they are viewed by their community,” explains Community Care writer Rachael Clawson.

The “My Marriage My Choice” project has developed free downloadable resources for practitioners, including a guidance toolkit for assessing capacity to consent to marriage, a case study collection, and a film about forced marriage.


Freedom United is interested in hearing from our community and welcomes relevant, informed comments, advice, and insights that advance the conversation around our campaigns and advocacy. We value inclusivity and respect within our community. To be approved, your comments should be civil.

stop icon A few things we do not tolerate: comments that promote discrimination, prejudice, racism, or xenophobia, as well as personal attacks or profanity. We screen submissions in order to create a space where the entire Freedom United community feels safe to express and exchange thoughtful opinions.

Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

This week

Passing of CSDDD blocked – human rights in danger

What could have been a day to celebrate, has turned into a day full of disappointment. On February 28, 2024, the European Council blocked the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD) after the vote had been postponed due to insufficient support, as reported by Reuters. Thirteen out of the 27 member states voted against the law or abstained from the vote, leaving the ‘qualified majority' of 15 countries short of one. A timeline of

| Wednesday February 28, 2024

Read more