Rich Nations Ramp Up Anti-Trafficking Funding. Will Businesses Follow? -

Rich Nations Ramp Up Anti-Trafficking Funding. Will Businesses Follow?

  • Published on
    April 11, 2018
  • News Source Image
  • Category:
    Human Trafficking, Law & Policy, Prevention, Supply Chain
Hero Banner

The world’s top economies have increased their funding for anti-trafficking efforts according to new figures from the United Nations. However, many observers believe that businesses need to step up to the plate and take greater responsibility in ensuring that their supply chains are slavery-free.

In UN data provided to Thomson Reuters Foundation, aid for anti-trafficking measures from the 35-member OECD (the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development) surpassed $400 million in 2013. Compared to a decade earlier, OECD nations had only spent $124 million per year to combat trafficking.

Still, as Thomson Reuters Foundation reports, some believe that sustainable solutions also need to come from the private sector:

While government and philanthropic funding is valuable, companies hold the key to driving long-term change – by cleaning up their supply chains – said Nick Grono, head of the Freedom Fund, the first private donor fund dedicated to ending slavery.

From clothes and cosmetics to smartphones, major brands are under rising pressure from consumers to disclose what they are doing to ensure products are free of forced or child labour.

“The biggest impact won’t come from funding, but from firms investing resources to transform their supply chains, be more transparent and change their procurement practices,” Grono said.

One of the main debates within the aid sector is how to spend money to address human trafficking. Some want to focus on primarily direct services for survivors and vulnerable populations, while others want to focus on advocacy and education.

But as Ed Marcum, managing director of U.S.-based foundation Humanity United (HU), points out, “You cannot focus only on direct services yet fail to address other critical forces and trends. Otherwise you are just rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic.”

Ben Skinner, founder of Transparentem, an intelligence unit that analyses supply chains, also believes the private sector needs to do more. Traditionally, counter-trafficking funding is not considered a priority for donor governments compared with issues such as HIV, education, and conflict.

As modern slavery is often found in the supply chains of private companies, businesses have a huge responsibility in addressing labor trafficking. But as Grono adds, “It’s not easy and it’s not cheap.”


Freedom United is interested in hearing from our community and welcomes relevant, informed comments, advice, and insights that advance the conversation around our campaigns and advocacy. We value inclusivity and respect within our community. To be approved, your comments should be civil.

stop icon A few things we do not tolerate: comments that promote discrimination, prejudice, racism, or xenophobia, as well as personal attacks or profanity. We screen submissions in order to create a space where the entire Freedom United community feels safe to express and exchange thoughtful opinions.

Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

This week

Passing of CSDDD blocked – human rights in danger

What could have been a day to celebrate, has turned into a day full of disappointment. On February 28, 2024, the European Council blocked the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD) after the vote had been postponed due to insufficient support, as reported by Reuters. Thirteen out of the 27 member states voted against the law or abstained from the vote, leaving the ‘qualified majority' of 15 countries short of one. A timeline of

| Wednesday February 28, 2024

Read more