Latest modern slavery fight updates - FreedomUnited.org

Sex Traffickers Claim ‘Cruel & Unusual’ Sentence

  • Published on
    October 23, 2018
  • News Source Image
  • Category:
    Human Trafficking, Law & Policy
Hero Banner

“Cruel and unusual punishment” is what two men who pled guilty to trafficking two teenage girls for the sale of sexual services in Ontario, Canada, claim their four-year prison sentences are.

Lawyers for Minas Abara, 20, and Nicholas Kulafofski, 19, are challenging the mandatory minimum sentence of four years while Assistant Crown Attorney Bianca DiBiase is calling for sentences of five to eight years.

Abara’s lawyer has claimed that the four-year prison sentence could result in ‘trauma’ to his client.

CBC News reports:

Abara and Kulafofski’s lawyers are arguing the mandatory minimum sentence set out in the Criminal Code of Canada violates the men’s right to be free of cruel and unusual treatment or punishment, a right in the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

Kulafofski’s lawyer, Frances Brennan, suggests the judge impose a sentence of 15 to 18 months in jail and two years probation for her client.

Abara’s lawyer, Chris Uwagboe, said the penitentiary term of four years “would have an irreparable effect” on his client.

“The loss of freedom, and separation from family and society at such a young age would be a trauma that (Abara) may never recover from,” Uwagboe wrote.

DiBiase’s submission to the court stated that Abara and Kulafofski controlled the girls’ “’schedule, what sexual acts (the victims) would perform and the price for each sexual service.’” The sex traffickers’ victims were 14 and 17 at the time of their trafficking.

While mandatory minimum sentences for crimes such as murder have been in place in Canadian law for a long time, however, between 2005 and 2016 a number of new ones were introduced. Since then, mandatory minimum sentences have been overturned in cases of human trafficking.

A judge will consider arguments, sentencing submissions and victim statements prior to making a decision on the sentences.

Subscribe

Freedom United is interested in hearing from our community and welcomes relevant, informed comments, advice, and insights that advance the conversation around our campaigns and advocacy. We value inclusivity and respect within our community. To be approved, your comments should be civil.

stop icon A few things we do not tolerate: comments that promote discrimination, prejudice, racism, or xenophobia, as well as personal attacks or profanity. We screen submissions in order to create a space where the entire Freedom United community feels safe to express and exchange thoughtful opinions.

Notify of
guest
90 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Mike Kirkby
Mike Kirkby
5 years ago

What about the trauma they caused to all their victims. That’s a gift that will keep on giving for years. Sorry fellas but if it was up to me you’d have gotten double.

Nancy
Nancy
5 years ago

They deserve a much longer sentence. Women are not objects and I’m sure they were terrorized by these horrible men.

Dave
Dave
5 years ago

Cruel and unusual these people should be locked up for at least ten years no thought for the victims and their trauma. They only saw objects not people and the money they hoped to get. Ten years please.

Mary Jones
Mary Jones
5 years ago

So the irreparable damage to these girls, who were abused, doesn’t matter? The trauma they have endured is definitely something from which they will, (not may) never recover. Male lawyer; what would he know of being raped? Some men just don’t get it, do they. They don’t get what a total violation of another’s very being, sexual abuse is.

Colin Abbott
Colin Abbott
5 years ago

These poor girls will suffer for the rest of their lives, and they complain about FOUR YEARS, should be FOUR YEARS FOR EACH GIRL.

This week

Modern slavery victims at the heart of U.K.'s controversial Rwanda deportation policy

In a significant development in U.K. immigration policy, the debate over the Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill, recently renamed the Safety of Rwanda Bill, has intensified. Central to this controversy is the treatment of victims of modern slavery, with the legislative outcome heavily impacting their rights and safety. Legislative standoff After a prolonged standoff between the unelected House of Lords and the elected House of Commons, expectations

| Tuesday April 16, 2024

Read more