Latest modern slavery fight updates -

Asylum seekers in the U.K. only receive legal support days before deportation

  • Published on
    October 16, 2020
  • News Source Image
  • Category:
    Law & Policy
Hero Banner

New research has highlighted how asylum seekers arriving in the U.K. on makeshift boats are not receiving legal advice until days before they are due to be deported.

Immigration rights group Movement for Justice reports that people are being denied legal advice at an early stage of their detainment in immigration facilities in the U.K., and that victims of trafficking are being missed.

Over half of those interviewed for the study reported that they were victims of torture and trafficking, and subjected to forced labor and rape in countries such as Libya.

On arrival, people are placed in the notorious Yarl’s Wood, which has recently been repurposed from a women’s detention center into a short-term holding facility to detain people who arrived in the U.K. in makeshift boats across the English Channel.

While some are given numbers for solicitors a few days after arriving at Yarl’s Wood, language difficulties and a lack of phone credit make it impossible to secure any legal representation.

Following detainment at Yarl’s Wood, people seeking asylum are often taken to another facility, Brook House, where they are served with removal notices, usually given within a matter of days before their deportation flight.

Fortunately, there have been a recent string of cases where the Home Office’s attempts to deport asylum seekers have been thwarted by immigration lawyers intervening at the last minute, identifying that deportation of these people is unlawful and places the individual at risk.

However, the damage caused by detainment and lack of legal representation has already been done.

The Independent reports:

Karen Doyle, national organiser at Movement for Justice, accused Ms Patel and the Home Office of “trampling on” the UK’s stated commitment to human rights by creating a “Dover to deportation pipeline”, which at every stage “frustrates” refugees’ ability to get the legal advice, care and support they need.

She added: “Yarl’s Wood is but one link in that pipeline, but it is a crucial one. Had those asylum seekers been able to access legal representation at the earliest opportunity they would not have been subject to the further torture of detention and threat of removal, which has led to so many suicide attempts in Brook House.”

While the Home Office claims it is attempting to make the U.K. asylum system ‘fairer and firmer,’ the evidence suggests that in actual fact this is resulting in victims of trafficking and torture being detained and denied legal assistance.


Freedom United is interested in hearing from our community and welcomes relevant, informed comments, advice, and insights that advance the conversation around our campaigns and advocacy. We value inclusivity and respect within our community. To be approved, your comments should be civil.

stop icon A few things we do not tolerate: comments that promote discrimination, prejudice, racism, or xenophobia, as well as personal attacks or profanity. We screen submissions in order to create a space where the entire Freedom United community feels safe to express and exchange thoughtful opinions.

Notify of
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
3 years ago

Nobody’s bothered to ask them 😠

Tim Beecher
Tim Beecher
3 years ago
Reply to  Angus McKay

It’s not illegal to seek asylum in this way. The UK accepts the least number of asylum seekers in Europe who flee in this way. There are many reasons for fleeing here, eg. they speak English and/or they know a friend here and feel more supported, after their hellish experience? I’m sure they would much rather stay in their own country; the way the UK is currently going, there must be a very good reason to flee here, not to mention the vitriol they receive from clueless bigots.

d scattergood
3 years ago

Just get rid of them,they are only after our benefits.

Angus McKay
Angus McKay
3 years ago

They claim “that they were victims of torture and trafficking, and subjected to forced labor and rape in countries such as Libya”. They weren’t in countries such as Libya prior to making it illegally into the UK. They were in France, safe from torture, trafficking, subjected to forced labor and rape. So why are they still “fleeing” to the UK?

This week

Rounded up and abandoned: Europe’s covert support of migrant atrocities

It is well documented that inhumane immigration policies are forcing migrants to take extremely risky routes on their journey to seek asylum in Europe and globally. However, a year-long investigation by the Washington Post, Lighthouse Reports, and a consortium of international media outlets uncovered that migrant lives are not just at risk due to sketchy channel crossings and being packed in the back of refrigerator trucks. To dissuade sub-Saharan

| Wednesday May 22, 2024

Read more