Trafficking survivors in the U.K. entitled to claim axed financial support, court rules

Trafficking survivors in the U.K. entitled to claim axed financial support, court rules

  • Published on
    December 23, 2021
  • Written by:
    Monica Burns
  • Category:
    Human Trafficking, Law & Policy
Hero Banner

The U.K. government cut financial support for trafficking survivors who had claimed asylum and were being housed in hotels in July 2020. Now a court has ruled the policy was unlawful and that those affected are entitled to back payments.  

Some survivors turned to begging to meet basic needs 

Trafficking survivors seeking asylum were previously eligible for weekly payments of £65 – approximately, $85. In light of the COVID-19 pandemic, some of these people were moved from self-contained accommodation into hotels. With the move, the payments stopped.  

The withdrawal of financial support left thousands without basic necessities, such as sanitary products. Reports suggest some people were forced to beg to cover their needs. 

Case brought by a Ghanaian who had escaped from modern slavery  

Legal action against this policy was taken, triggering a U-turn from the Home Office on August, 30. 

The Guardian reports: 

“The case was brought by a man who was trafficked from Ghana to the UK in March 2011. He was held captive in a property in Birmingham and forced to work for his captors. He was physically abused with beatings before escaping. In November 2019, he was arrested as an illegal immigrant and identified as a potential victim of trafficking. In March 2020, he was provided with government support and placed in temporary accommodation in a hotel, receiving £35 a week support and three meals a day.  

On 10 July 2020 his financial support was cut off before later being reinstated at a lower rate.” 

Court finds the policy unlawful 

Deputy high court judge Peter Marquand found this policy change unlawful on December, 17. The details of how back payments will be made will be decided in a separate court hearing.  

Ahmed Aydeed of Duncan Lewis solicitors, the firm that brought the case, said: “We welcome the court’s ruling and hope survivors can now finally get the basic support they were entitled to and they so desperately need. However we will never know how many survivors were re-trafficked and fell back into debt bondage due to the home secretary’s unlawful action.”

Join the campaign calling on the U.K. to guarantee statutory support for all survivors of modern slavery.

Freedom United is interested in hearing from our community and welcomes relevant, informed comments, advice, and insights that advance the conversation around our campaigns and advocacy. We value inclusivity and respect within our community. To be approved, your comments should be civil.

stop icon A few things we do not tolerate: comments that promote discrimination, prejudice, racism, or xenophobia, as well as personal attacks or profanity. We screen submissions in order to create a space where the entire Freedom United community feels safe to express and exchange thoughtful opinions.

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

This week

Four years on, has Australia's Modern Slavery Act been effective?

An independent review of Australia's Modern Slavery Act has concluded that the legislation is failing to have a significant impact on curbing modern slavery and urges the Australian government to implement recommendations to strengthen the law. The Australian government must act According to the latest Global Slavery Index released by international human rights organization Walk Free, an estimated 50 million people were in situations of modern slavery

| Wednesday May 31, 2023

Read more