Nearly a Third of Gov. Suppliers Ignore UK Anti-Slavery Law -

Nearly a Third of Gov. Suppliers Ignore UK Anti-Slavery Law

  • Published on
    May 21, 2019
  • News Source Image
  • Category:
    Law & Policy, Supply Chain
Hero Banner

Britain has some work to do if it wants other countries to follow its lead.

New research from business consultancies Sancroft and Tussell found that 29 out of 100 of the government’s top suppliers did not meet a legal requirement of the UK Modern Slavery Act to report on how they are addressing modern slavery in their supply chains.

Take Action: Guarantee Support for UK Victims

“It is reasonable for the business community to expect the government to first lead by example and ensure that its own suppliers are legally compliant,” the report read.

“Non-compliance … stands at 29% – in our view, a very high failure rate given the simplicity of the legal requirements.”

Thomson Reuters Foundation reports:

Four of the suppliers in sectors from aerospace and defence to recruitment did not produce a statement, while others such as Microsoft did not feature it correctly on their websites or failed to have the document signed by directors, the study said.

Britain’s 2015 Modern Slavery Act requires companies whose turnover exceeds 36 million pounds ($46 million) to produce an annual statement detailing the actions they have taken to tackle slavery in their operations, but does not include public bodies.

Just under three-quarters of about 17,000 firms required to comply with the law have issued statements to date, according to Transparency in the Supply Chain (TISC) – a public database.

The legislation is under review over concerns that Britain is struggling to stay ahead in the global push to end slavery and lawmakers and activists have called for it to be sharpened by including tougher penalties and covering the public sector.

Airbus, accountancy firm Ernst & Young (EY), and Microsoft were among those found to be non-compliant by failing to post a link to their modern slavery statements on their website homepage. Airbus and Ernst & Young fixed the problem after being notified, but Microsoft did not respond to Thomson Reuters Foundation request for comment.

A spokesperson for the Home Office said they are committed to preventing modern slavery in the government’s supply chains. “We are conducting a thorough audit of which companies are compliant … and those not complying, including government suppliers, risk being publicly named,” she said.

Freedom United is interested in hearing from our community and welcomes relevant, informed comments, advice, and insights that advance the conversation around our campaigns and advocacy. We value inclusivity and respect within our community. To be approved, your comments should be civil.

stop icon A few things we do not tolerate: comments that promote discrimination, prejudice, racism, or xenophobia, as well as personal attacks or profanity. We screen submissions in order to create a space where the entire Freedom United community feels safe to express and exchange thoughtful opinions.

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

This week

Three Chinese companies face restricted imports due to forced labor ties

In an effort to eliminate goods made with Uyghur forced labor, the U.S. State Department added three more Chinese companies to the list of those facing import restrictions for goods coming into the U.S. This brings the total number of companies on the list to 27.  Goods from Xinjiang (Uyghur region) are guilty until proven innocent  The legal backing for these restrictions falls under the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act Entity List (UFLPA) which

| Wednesday September 27, 2023

Read more