Latest modern slavery fight updates - FreedomUnited.org

Human Rights in Supply Chains

  • Published on
    June 26, 2016
  • News Source Image
  • Category:
Hero Banner

Human rights are at risk.  In the globalized economy in which we live, businesses across all sectors find sources of goods and services from a complex network chain of suppliers.  These sources often cross several countries…

These many countries may have different legal, regulatory, and human rights practices. The International Labour Organization (ILO) estimates that more than 450 million people work in supply chain-related jobs. These chains offer the business many great opportunities but they also create some very serious human rights risks, often leaving those companies with great problems to solve.

 

Some of those supply chains are rather informal and the human rights abuses in such supply chains can effect, for example, women workers, migrant workers, child laborers, or residents of rural or poor urban areas.

16-year-old tobacco worker

A 16-year-old tobacco worker standing in a tobacco field in North Carolina wearing her work clothes. “I don’t feel any different in the fields than when I was 12,” she said. “I [still] get headaches and … my stomach hurts. And like I feel nauseous…. I just feel like my stomach is like rumbling around. I feel like I’m gonna throw up.” © 2015 Benedict Evans for Human Rights Watch

 International norms, such as the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, recognize that companies should undertake “human rights due diligence” measures to ensure their operations respect human rights and do not contribute to human rights abuses. Human rights due diligence includes steps to assess actual and potential human rights risks, take effective measures to mitigate those risks, and act to end abuses and ensure remedy for any that occur in spite of those efforts. Companies should also be fully transparent about these efforts.

But the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights and other international norms for companies are not legally binding. Companies can and sometimes do ignore them, or take them up half-heartedly and ineffectively. Many companies have inadequate or no human rights due diligence measures in place, and their actions cause or contribute to human rights abuses. For more than two decades, in every region of the world, Human Rights Watch has documented human rights abuses in the context of global supply chains in agriculture, the garment and footwear industry, mining, construction, and other sectors.

The 2016, the International Labour Conference, which is a global summit of governments, employers, and trade unions on labor issues, calls for a unique set of opportunities to bring about significant change. For the first time, the ILC will aim on decent work in international supply chains. One main problem is that there is not a legally binding set of standards that will guarantee all companies comply to taking human rights due diligence seriously.  Now there are only  voluntary standards, and while valuable, that is not enough.

View Article on Human Rights Watch

Subscribe

Freedom United is interested in hearing from our community and welcomes relevant, informed comments, advice, and insights that advance the conversation around our campaigns and advocacy. We value inclusivity and respect within our community. To be approved, your comments should be civil.

stop icon A few things we do not tolerate: comments that promote discrimination, prejudice, racism, or xenophobia, as well as personal attacks or profanity. We screen submissions in order to create a space where the entire Freedom United community feels safe to express and exchange thoughtful opinions.

Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

This week

Canada ombudsperson report exposes Dynasty Gold's complicity in Uyghur forced labor

The Canada Ombudsperson for Responsible Enterprise (CORE) released its first final report this week after a complaint filed in 2022 against Vancouver company Dynasty Gold. Reuters reports that the complaint came from a coalition of 28 human rights groups including the Uyghur Rights Advocacy Project and Raoul Wallenberg Centre for Human Rights. It claimed that the company benefited from the use of Uyghur forced labor at a mine in China in which they held

| Tuesday March 26, 2024

Read more