£40 a Week to Build Qatar's World Cup Stadiums - FreedomUnited.org

£40 a Week to Build Qatar’s World Cup Stadiums

  • Published on
    November 21, 2018
  • News Source Image
  • Category:
    Forced Labor, Law & Policy
Hero Banner

Qatar is the world’s wealthiest per capita state, but many migrant workers building grand World Cup stadiums in preparation for 2022 are only receiving £40 a week.

The Guardian spoke with several construction workers from Ghana to understand how they came to work in Qatar and how working conditions have changed — or not changed — under Qatar’s promises of reform.

Following global pressure from human rights organizations and media investigations, Qatar has embarked on reforms to how it treats migrant construction workers. On a tour led by Qatar’s supreme committee, which is overseeing stadium construction, journalists learned about improved safety training, mandatory breaks during excessive heat, and canteens filled with electrolyte-rich water for workers. All signs were in English, Hindi, and Tamil, and there was even a confidential grievance hotline.

It seemed like all had been fixed, until the workers sat down with The Guardian:

So when I finally sat down to talk to the workers, I was almost ready for them to say they could hardly be happier. Aged between 28 and 38, all married with at least one child, they acknowledged that the camp was decent; they had Ghanaian friends in other camps which were dirty, and had no food or amenities. Then they started to talk about the pay.

“It is hard to be away for so long,” one said. “Sometimes the family want to have you in their midst – and you may not have money to send them. We were supposed to earn something big – but we earn small.”

Asked how much, one of them opened his eyes wide in exasperation, and said: “650 a month basic salary.”

For building one of the prestige stadiums designed so Qatar can dazzle the world in 2022, eight hours a day, six days a week, this is £140: a little under £35 per week; £5 per day.

Still, Houtan Homayounpour, head of the ILO’s Qatar project office, says that clear progress is being made and that one cannot expect things to change overnight. He pointed to the abolition of the rule that workers get an exit permit from their employers in order to leave the country, as well as settlement committees for workers’ disputes, legal protections for domestic workers, and a commitment to ending the notorious “kafala” system.

The supreme committee appeared to not see issues with low wages, however, stressing that what they earn in Qatar is still better than anything they could make back home.

But not all migrant workers have been able to earn even these meager wages. When a journalist from The Guardian spoke to Bangladeshi men living outside of designated camps, they told him “people are working but not being paid. There is no work, or very low pay.”

One man said his wife criticized him for going to Qatar because he couldn’t send any money home to support his family — unlike rickshaw drivers in his village.

The 2022 World Cup, as The Guardian writes, is “inescapably, a World Cup of inequality, hosted by the per capita wealthiest country, built by men from the poorest.”


Freedom United is interested in hearing from our community and welcomes relevant, informed comments, advice, and insights that advance the conversation around our campaigns and advocacy. We value inclusivity and respect within our community. To be approved, your comments should be civil.

stop icon A few things we do not tolerate: comments that promote discrimination, prejudice, racism, or xenophobia, as well as personal attacks or profanity. We screen submissions in order to create a space where the entire Freedom United community feels safe to express and exchange thoughtful opinions.

Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

This week

Passing of CSDDD blocked – human rights in danger

What could have been a day to celebrate, has turned into a day full of disappointment. On February 28, 2024, the European Council blocked the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD) after the vote had been postponed due to insufficient support, as reported by Reuters. Thirteen out of the 27 member states voted against the law or abstained from the vote, leaving the ‘qualified majority' of 15 countries short of one. A timeline of

| Wednesday February 28, 2024

Read more