Latest modern slavery fight updates - FreedomUnited.org
Donate

Close loopholes that allow forced child marriage in the UK

  • Published on
    August 3, 2017
  • News Source Image
  • Category:
    Child Slavery, Forced Marriage
Hero Banner

Four co-chairs of Girls Not Brides UK call for action to stop forced marriage. In a statement published in The Guardian, Naana Otoo-Oyrtey, Diana Nammi, Lubna Maktari, Jasvinder Sanghera, all co-chairs of Girls Not Brides UK, spoke out about recent reports of an increase in calls to NSPCC concerning forced marriage. More than a quarter of cases handled by the Forced Marriage Unit involved children under the age of 18.

The statement decried forced child marriage as a harmful practice with severe, lifelong consequences. It declared child marriage a violation of human rights under international law. The article suggested the increase in calls demonstrate an urgent need for action, particularly closing loopholes which allow forced marriage to continue in the U.K.  These loopholes include provisions in England, Wales and Northern Ireland for 16- and 17-year-olds to marry with parental consent, which can often mean coercion.

Subscribe

Freedom United is interested in hearing from our community and welcomes relevant, informed comments, advice, and insights that advance the conversation around our campaigns and advocacy. We value inclusivity and respect within our community. To be approved, your comments should be civil.

stop icon A few things we do not tolerate: comments that promote discrimination, prejudice, racism, or xenophobia, as well as personal attacks or profanity. We screen submissions in order to create a space where the entire Freedom United community feels safe to express and exchange thoughtful opinions.

Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

This week

Starbucks sued over complicity in trafficking and forced labor of coffee workers in Brazil

On April 24, 2025, the advocacy group International Rights Advocates (IRA) filed a federal class-action lawsuit against Starbucks. The suit alleges that the global coffee giant knowingly profited from coffee harvested through forced labor in Brazil. Simultaneously, Coffee Watch submitted a petition to US Customs and Border Protection to block imports of coffee produced with forced labor. The case centers around eight Brazilian workers identified as

| Thursday April 24, 2025

Read more